Skip to content
wubbery://regulated — healthcare, government, finance, critical infrastructure
Your blocker was never capability. It is that nobody can prove where the data went.
The AI works. It has worked for two years. What has not existed is a control you can demonstrate to an auditor rather than describe in a policy document — and a refusal reproduced in front of someone is worth more than any accuracy figure. Every control here declines in the room, at a fixed seed, on request.
3/3Out-of-region routes blocked, with no residency policy as the baseline
3/3Injected directives masked before reaching a privileged context
100%PII redaction recall with zero false positives over 200 clean lines
What actually binds
A promise is not a control, and your auditor knows the difference
Most AI governance is a policy document plus a vendor assurance. Neither survives a question like 'show me it refusing'. The distinction that matters to a regulator is between a system configured not to do something and a system that demonstrably cannot — and only the second one is evidence.
Quotas are not isolation
A tenant inside every quota can still reach across a boundary, and a capacity audit finds nothing wrong because nothing is wrong by the measure being audited. The two are conflated in most multi-tenant systems, which is why isolation breaches survive review.
Agents made the old model insufficient
Every board has now asked what happens when an agent reads a document that tells it to email the customer database. The honest answer for most deployments is that nothing stops it. Prompt injection, runaway cascades and privilege escalation through a delegation chain are the three that block sign-off, and the market has almost nothing to buy.
Measured, on a named alternative
Guards are reported blocked-of-attempted, never as a percentage — “zero violations” without the attempt count is a claim about nothing. Each is posed against a case that passes the check the industry already runs, because a guard that only catches obvious mistakes measures nothing.
Checked on this workload9 measured checks run here, of which 8 refuse a target outright rather than degrade toward it. You see every one of them, against your own traffic, in a proof of concept.
22 of 22 blocked
What it moves for you — WUBBERY off, then on
Every pair below is the same measurement with WUBBERY switched off and then on, under the condition printed beside it. Your own traffic replaces the population in the shadow run.
anomaliesWithout—→With WUBBERY98.2% caught
at a 2.1% false-alarm rate, real cross-workload traffic, nothing injectedNever quoted without the false-alarm rate. Anyone catches everything by alarming on everything.
What it means for you
This is the same measurement, WUBBERY off and then on. The only way to know what it does on your traffic is to watch it there: a free shadow run serves everything exactly as you do today and shows both columns, live, for you. Nothing replaced, nothing bought, nothing owed unless it wins.
Start a free shadow runWithout2,007 attempts→With WUBBERY2,007 blocked
counted, never a percentage — the count of guards and the per-guard N of M are the honest unitsWe spend our time trying to break our own system and publish how many attempts got through. So far, none.
What it means for you
This is the same measurement, WUBBERY off and then on. The only way to know what it does on your traffic is to watch it there: a free shadow run serves everything exactly as you do today and shows both columns, live, for you. Nothing replaced, nothing bought, nothing owed unless it wins.
Start a free shadow runWithout6,161 questions→With WUBBERY0 fabrications
abstention cost 4.7%It says it does not know rather than making something up, and we counted.
What it means for you
This is the same measurement, WUBBERY off and then on. The only way to know what it does on your traffic is to watch it there: a free shadow run serves everything exactly as you do today and shows both columns, live, for you. Nothing replaced, nothing bought, nothing owed unless it wins.
Start a free shadow run Every pair above is WUBBERY off, then on. See both columns on your own traffic — free, nothing replaced, nothing owed unless it wins.
Start a free shadow runSee it on your own traffic
Free and read-only. It runs beside your system on your real traffic, and nothing changes until you say so.
What we will not claim: Injection masking raises the cost of an attack substantially and does not eliminate it, and we will not tell you otherwise in a procurement conversation. The guard governs the control surfaces you declare to it, and it reports what it cannot see rather than assuming it sees everything. The redactor covers structured identifiers rather than free-form ones, and its exact boundary is written down and walked through under NDA. The point is that every limit here is stated rather than discovered — that is what makes the figures above worth reading.
Figures measured at seed 1 on the WUBBERY engine and reproducible with the command above. WUBBERY is independent; company and product names are used for identification only and imply no endorsement.
